@rml @ldbeth @galdor @svetlyak40wt Maybe try invoking common lisp's 'INSPECT to enter inspection mode? A simple (or complicated) device is to use 'MACROLET to exploratorily locally clobber erstwhile function calls. I think scheme works too differently to common lisp for debugging to be the same. I'm not going to try to talk about lldb.

@rml @svetlyak40wt @galdor @ldbeth it's very cool: I still want to read more of the lisp papers about scheme. I'm not really sold on the things continuation passing allows (easily) that common lisp's evaluation model doesn't though.

@rml which lisp? @svetlyak40wt @galdor @ldbeth honestly I don't use common lisp's lldb or even 'inspect much so I second this question. What are some good things to start fixing?

@ldbeth @rml I like that article and hamfistedly express those ideas sometimes. But I have a few comments about continuations as a non-schemer.

I think the reason continuations were mandated like this is that there are a few constructs (which never happen and at great cost) that are only possible beautifully and in the correct complexity with continuations exactly like this; that we simply must do something else for in common lisp.

@Sandra continuations?

@ekaitz_zarraga I get video not found