Notices

1. Devine Lu Ator (neauoire@merveilles.town)'s status on Friday, 20-May-2022 00:29:45 CEST Devine Lu Ator

   in reply to

   • अनीश
   • Cass

   @cassvs @aynish I'm not planning to implement lisp, although, it already pretty much serves the exact same APIs. I needed a little untyped lambda calculus framework for a project of mine so I added cons cells in assembly.

   I was surprised how easy it was to implement these at the lowest level. It's actually quite elegant. I wrote a few s-exp parsers in javascript and it doesn't even come close to the beauty of doing it in forth.

   • अनीश (aynish@merveilles.town)'s status on Friday, 20-May-2022 00:29:47 CEST अनीश

     in reply to

     • Cass

     @cassvs which is the lispuxn?

   • Cass (cassvs@merveilles.town)'s status on Friday, 20-May-2022 00:29:47 CEST Cass

     in reply to

     • अनीश

     @aynish @neauoire's recent work with cons cells ( https://merveilles.town/@neauoire/108324145853644712 ) seems to be heading in a lispy direction, to my extremely uninformed eye at least

     Honestly there could already be high level languages for uxn. I have a bad habit of not checking the awesomeuxn list before I post 😣

   • Cass (cassvs@merveilles.town)'s status on Friday, 20-May-2022 00:29:48 CEST Cass

     Always knew someone would write a high level language compiler for uxn. Just didn't think the first would be a lisp