Public
- Public
- Network
- Groups
- Popular
- People

Conversation

Notices

Tisse(prim)vert 🌺 (alice@bidule.menf.in)'s status on Thursday, 17-Jun-2021 10:35:58 CEST Tisse(prim)vert 🌺

Next time someone mentions docker (yeah, because it seems these people tend to not know about the general concept of «container» or that there are other implementations) as a means for reproducibility, I just ragequit and let them make their own experience. 🙄

In conversation Thursday, 17-Jun-2021 10:35:58 CEST from bidule.menf.in permalink
- Ekaitz Zárraga 👹 repeated this.
- Ludovic Courtès (civodul@toot.aquilenet.fr)'s status on Thursday, 17-Jun-2021 10:35:58 CEST Ludovic Courtès
  in reply to
  
  @alice There’s a growing understanding that “containers” are not helping much in way of reproducibility—Docker images are generally not reproducible to begin with. Growing awareness in both “reproducible science” circles and industry, as in https://lwn.net/Articles/786066/ . I’m full of hope! :-)
  In conversation Thursday, 17-Jun-2021 10:35:58 CEST permalink
  Attachments
  1. An update on compliance for containers
    
    The inability to determine the contents of container images is a topic that annoys Dirk Hohndel. At last year's Legal and Licensing Workshop (LLW), he gave a presentation that highlighted the problem and some work he had been doing to combat it. At this year's LLW, he updated attendees on the progress that has been made and where he hopes things will go from here.

Feeds

tiflolinux.org - GNU Social is a social network, courtesy of tiflolinux.org. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.1-beta0, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

All tiflolinux.org - GNU Social content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.