Interesting how the US govt Executive Order on “cybersecurity” (May 2021) is clear and precise when it comes to software supply chain security: “using administratively separate build environments”, “employing automated tools […] to maintain trusted source code supply chains”, etc. (Rings a bell?)
Conversation
Notices
-
Ludovic Courtès (civodul@toot.aquilenet.fr)'s status on Monday, 06-Sep-2021 11:10:29 CEST Ludovic Courtès
-
arnebab@rollenspiel.social's status on Monday, 06-Sep-2021 11:10:28 CEST ArneBab
@mala @civodul If they want to spend that the most efficient way, they should donate much of it to #nlnet. Those folks know what they are doing and have a proven track record of improving the status quo.
-
Danny O'B (mala@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 06-Sep-2021 11:10:28 CEST Danny O'B
@ArneBab @civodul i would love to see what #nlnet would do with $10 billion
-
Be (be@fosstodon.org)'s status on Monday, 06-Sep-2021 11:10:28 CEST Be
@mala @ArneBab @civodul Hire a bunch of people to work on bootstrapping Guix? That would be great.
-
Danny O'B (mala@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 06-Sep-2021 11:10:29 CEST Danny O'B
@civodul i think it’s worth looking at how Google responded to that order (with an apparent commitment of $10B): less because I think their approach is better or even valid, but because that position is what we will be swimming in for the next few years https://blog.google/technology/safety-security/why-were-committing-10-billion-to-advance-cybersecurity/
-