tiflolinux.org - GNU Social
  • Login

Bienvenido

  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Ekaitz Zárraga 👹 (ekaitz_zarraga@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 07-Sep-2018 17:09:43 CEST Ekaitz Zárraga 👹 Ekaitz Zárraga 👹
    • Shamar
    • Carlos Fdez Llamas
    • Wolf480pl

    @Shamar @sirikon @Wolf480pl Dude, step by step!
    We'll see what happens!

    In conversation Friday, 07-Sep-2018 17:09:43 CEST from mastodon.social permalink
    • .:Ninjatrappeur:. (ninjatrappeur@social.alternativebit.fr)'s status on Friday, 07-Sep-2018 17:32:16 CEST .:Ninjatrappeur:. .:Ninjatrappeur:.
      in reply to
      • Shamar
      • Carlos Fdez Llamas
      @sirikon

      Hey @Shamar , I've been reading your posts/comments on lobsters on this matter without never replying to it.

      I totally agree with you on this point. I've been ranting on this for the last 3 years without any traction as well. I think the problem here is more cultural than anything.

      I find funny that a consensus about the fact that Applets were a bad idea exists while we are recreating exactly the same kind of VM.

      My umatrix based tinfoil setup makes usually amuses my friends. As a matter of fact, it made smile @ekaitz_zarraga
      no later than last weekend :)

      Hence my suggestion: have you tried to get in touch with the umatrix/noscript guys? Looks like they are trying to fix the same problem.

      I feel like JS blocker UX is kind of an unexplored problem. Maybe if we could find a UX allowing non technical users to intuitively choose what kind of code they wanna run on their machine we would be taken more seriously.

      Anyways, that was my almost useless 2 cents.
      In conversation Friday, 07-Sep-2018 17:32:16 CEST permalink
      Ekaitz Zárraga 👹 repeated this.
    • Shamar (shamar@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 07-Sep-2018 17:40:48 CEST Shamar Shamar
      in reply to
      • .:Ninjatrappeur:.
      • Carlos Fdez Llamas

      @Ninjatrappeur @ekaitz_zarraga @sirikon

      I didn't talk with uMatrix/NoScript devs because I think #privacy and #security should be the default working mode of the #Web.

      You should opt-in #JavaScript, not opt-in into safety.

      Also I think they would have a hard time at fixing some of the aspect of this issue (think about view-source, for example).

      Finally the just protect #Chrome and #Firefox users.

      I talked with #Mozilla because the write the #LivingStandards and they can fix them with FF.

      In conversation Friday, 07-Sep-2018 17:40:48 CEST permalink
      Ekaitz Zárraga 👹 repeated this.

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

tiflolinux.org - GNU Social is a social network, courtesy of tiflolinux.org. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.1-beta0, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All tiflolinux.org - GNU Social content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.