@ArneBab@AbbieNormal Yes, if you work well with Emacs there is no point in switching to the other. The problem is that I have never been able to feel comfortable with Emacs, it dominates me and not me it 😀. If there was a book like April Speight's book for Spacemacs I would probably look at that one, but that book doesn't exist. It's also an age thing, I'm going to be 50 soon, I don't have enough energy and time.
If I listen to @AbbieNormal that "tooling is more important than the language per se" maybe I should instead look at Visual Studio Code for Python programmers by April Speight. We'll see...
honestly, it's 1030pm and if we arent gonna have power until 600am i might actually be cool with this, this is so peaceful in the dark by a big flickering candle. everyone is going to sleep but like this is so therapeutic
@abbienormal Yes, Scheme with types. The problem was Shen is BSD (the language), but Mark Tarver wanted Shen Professional (with other libraries) closed source. I don't know what the situation is at present. https://marktarver.com/open.html Anyway, for the book only Shen BSD is needed.
I still think Germans will win that war :D, but I didn't know that Mark Tarver had put the Shen Language book online: https://shenlanguage.org/TBoS/tbos.html There should be a lot of fun. Unfortunately I won't have time for either Ocaml or Shen in the next few months anyway.
@mdhughes I didn't mention the article for that reason, I wanted to point out that the " they need there always to be something in the way that prevents them getting whatever it is they pretend to want to do done" is quite in line with my own personality.
Si queremos hilar fino no es que nos guste ser perdedores, es que no damos para más. Pero si te metes en lisp sabiendo de antemano que no vas a dar la talla entonces es que inconscientemente te gusta perder. O sea que lleva razón.